![]() Thus, we see that being out of position, with a high stack-to-pot ratio, and a hand with poor playability can yield as low as 62% of our initial estimated value. R = EVrealistic / EVestimated = 1.36 / 2.21 =. Now, we can make a more precise, quantitative statement about our realization or R. Thus, a more realistic value for our EV is $1.34 Making some assumptions about bet sizes, PIO Solver shows us this for EV: What if we enter the same hand into a GTO tool such as PIO Solver? Then, we can arrive at a more realistic value for EV, since the tool takes position, stack depth, and hand playability into account. both players checked to the river), then SB’s EV would beĮVestimated = Pot * HEestimated = $6.00 *. If we assume that the big blind is calling with a 50% range of hands, then Equilab yields this: It is folded to us in the small blind, and we look down at 3h3s. Let’s look at a $.50/1.00 example where we face a flop decision. While some factors such as differences in player skill are difficult to quantify, other factors, such as position, stack depth, and playability, are easier, especially if we use a GTO tool. It can also be used to describe the relationship between our estimated value and our actual value. Realization in poker describes the relationship between our estimated hand equity and our actual hand equity. fold equity may occur.) This is where the concept of realization comes into play. Of course this is only an estimate because, assuming there are chips left, one player may decide to fold to a future bet (e.g. We can put in our hand and our best guess at our opponent’s range, and the tool will calculate the percentages for us. This is where tools like Equilab come in handy. Note that when discussing hand equity, we’re usually making an estimate. Hand Equity (HE) = the likelihood our hand will win Let’s clear things up by giving them more specific names: %W) and sometimes it refers to our share of the pot. Sometimes it refers to the likelihood our hand will win (e.g. Unfortunately, this term is often used to refer to two different things. In order to best understand realization, we first need to take a closer look at equity. Overall, it's worth it and it's not even close.(Editor’s note: PRO/CORE subscribers may wish to review the CORE lessons on expected value (EV) and equity before proceeding.) Now It takes much time to close the "Hand range selection" and recalc the equities for the subranges in the main windows. + very good scalability of the matrix grid, very nice visuallyĪnd what I'd like to see in PEQ is the equity % of the different groups vs range in grouping options view tab. + basically every feature that I need to make a good manual analysis ![]() Also enables me to make the analytical link from PEQ to PIO, to export and compare my manually designed ranges postflop to the theoretical models ![]() + able to copy/paste ranges to PIOSolver - enables me to copy preflop ranges. + export/import ranges from Equilab - which saved me a lot of time redoing the ranges. I will share the most useful features for me: In the trial, it didn't take long to see that PEQ has all the useful features that I've used in the other softwares, but also the developer himself was still actively developing the product and has an open mind for new features and even the smallest tweaks. I was a bit dissapointed by the lack of support and development for the programs above (especially combonator and PR),Īnd after I got recommended to check out the PowerEquiLab, I was a bit skeptical to pay-off another tool in the subscription era of online poker. Over the years I've used flopzilla, combonator and PokerRanger for more ,swift, basic and agile analysis in partnership with more heavy beasts like CREV. During my online poker career I've used almost every useful poker tool.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |